Tuesday, 16 October 2012

AN POST'S HIGH COURT RULING REGARDING POSTAL ADDRESSES


The recent victory by An Post in the high court creates an interesting situation for addressing in Ireland. To recap on what happened, An Post won a case against Comreg , where they challenged a direction forcing them to deliver to a legal or "geographical" address. A couple in Cork complained to Comreg that An Post were refusing to deliver to their address in rural Cork. The address in question was specified by the Local Authority, and as such one would imagine was the "legal" address for the property. 
An Post were insisting that they referred to the address differently in their post-town system and as such could not easily deliver to the address as specified. In effect, they were insisting that the householder use the An Post version of the address (the Postal Address), if they wanted mail delivered to them. Interestingly, Comreg supported the householder in this case, and agreed that An Post should be obliged to deliver to any "legal" address in the country, even if it differed from the address held by An Post. The High Court disagreed and ruled that An Post were entitled to specify how an address should be recorded, if the householder wanted their mail delivered. It also was reported that to do otherwise would create a major difficulty for the An Post system and require a fundamental change.
From this case, we can now ascertain that;
1. An Post may specify the address structure, format, and content that they choose for an address even if it varies completely from the address specified by the local authority. If they decide that you now live in 4 Main Street, Letterkenny, Co Donegal, Sligo, Co Dublin - must you put that on your mail or become a postal pariah ? Or is the freedom for freestyling addresses restricted in some way ?
2. An Post face a major technical or systematic issue in adding aliases for addresses. For example, in our Autoaddress technology, we can easily add an alias for an address, so Ballysmallplace, would be entered as a valid alternative for Ballysmalltown, and whenever the system came upon it again, it would automatically be matched and thus sorted. It is surprising that this causes such a headache in a multimillion-pound sortation system such as that used by An Post. Its almost like Tesco's home delivery service telling you "No sir, you don't live at 4 Bezzel Ave, Clontarf, Dublin 3, you now live at 4 Bezzel Ave, Coolock Distribution Depot, Dublin. Or else we can't deliver." Who said "the customer is always right" ?
An Post, as the designated service provider have a special place in determining the official postal address. I'm not sure where competitors to An Post would stand in regards to that ? Would a smaller mailer like Citypost, for example, be afforded the same right to specify their unique postal addresses that must be used or would the regulator have more power in tackling these undesignated providers ? If not, we may be forced to have a selection of addresses ready for use depending on who we want to deliver our mail.
Feargal O'Neill

Thursday, 4 October 2012

MAPINFO 11.5.1 - A PATCH ABOVE


MAPINFO 11.5.1 - A PATCH ABOVE


This release is a bit of a breakthrough for MapInfo. In previous patch releases, much of the body of the update has been given over to fixing bugs and not a lot else. In 11.5.1, it’s great to see not only the normal bug fixes being addressed, but there is also good number of new and enhanced functionality. This takes these kind of updates to a whole new level and we would advise our users to keep an eye out for them and continually update the software as patches are lreaeasedm, as you will really benefit from this enhanced product.
This release has also given us a brief insight into what may be down the line in terms of interoperability between PBS and Autodesk products, which is very exciting.
We are looking forward to seeing the beginning of the Pitney Bowes / Autodesk strategic alignment in the 11.5.2 maintenance release later in the year.
The body of the official press release for 11.5.1 can be found below.
Pitney Bowes Software has announced the immediate availability of the MapInfo Professional version 11.5.1 maintenance release. You can obtain the maintenance release by opening MapInfo Professional and selecting the “Help > Check for Update…” menu option

What’s New?

• Improved workspace opening – users can now skip missing files
• Support for Oracle external authentication (single sign-on)
• One click sorting in the Browser window
• Improvements to the Legend Designer, such as the ability to sort legend items
• Numerous fixes to customer issues

What’s next?

Another maintenance release (11.5.2) is due out later in the year which will add support for WFS 1.1 as well as integration with Autodesk products. For a complete list of issues addressed in the maintenance release, please refer to the release notes document on the web site. This patch can be applied to either MapInfo Professional or MapInfo Runtime version 11.5 only. If your organisation uses a software deployment package such as Microsoft SMS, you can download the maintenance release as a MSP file. Instructions for installing the MSP file can be found in the release notes, as can instructions on performing a silent installation of the maintenance release.